Cross-cultural adaptation of the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire into the Turkish language based on Rasch analysis
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, cilt.39, sa.8, ss.1753-1761, 2023 (SCI-Expanded)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 39 Sayı: 8
- Basım Tarihi: 2023
- Doi Numarası: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2048425
- Dergi Adı: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1753-1761
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Chronic spinal pain, neurophysiology of pain, pain knowledge, pain education
- Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Background: The Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (Revised-NPQ-Tr) is used to evaluate the chain in pain knowledge. No study has explored its validity and reliability for the Turkish language Objectives: : This study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Revised-NPQ-Tr in chronic spinal pain patients Methods: A total of 182 chronic spinal pain patients were included in the study. The Revised-NPQ-Tr results were analyzed using Rasch analysis to measure the psychometric properties Results: The Revised-NPQ-Tr indicates misfit to the Rasch model, as evidenced by the borderline significant p value (LR test = 27.626; df = 11; p = .004; Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.004). Two items were differentially affected by educational status. Removal of poor-functioning items did not improve the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. The Revised-NPQ-Tr is unidimensional and there was no local dependence between items. The questionnaire exhibits known group validity. Test–retest reliability of the questionnaire was moderate [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.629]; however, the internal consistency of the questionnaire was found to be low (Cronbach’s α = 0.330; person separation index = 0.373) Conclusion: Although the internal validity of the Revised-NPQ-Tr version was acceptable, its reliability was found to be low. Consequently, the results of Revised-NPQ-Tr should be interpreted carefully in the clinic.