Cell Switching in HAPS-Aided Networking: How the Obscurity of Traffic Loads Affects the Decision

Ciloglu B., Koc G. B., ÖZTÜRK M., Yanikomeroglu H.

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol.73, no.11, pp.17782-17787, 2024 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 73 Issue: 11
  • Publication Date: 2024
  • Doi Number: 10.1109/tvt.2024.3420245
  • Journal Name: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, Aerospace Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Computer & Applied Sciences, Environment Index, INSPEC, Metadex, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Page Numbers: pp.17782-17787
  • Keywords: 6G, cell switching, energy efficiency, high-altitude platform station (HAPS), sustainability, VHetNet
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

This study aims to introduce the cell load estimation problem of cell switching approaches in wireless networks—specifically presented in a high-altitude platform station (HAPS)-assisted network. The problem arises from the fact that the traffic loads of sleeping base stations for the next time slot cannot be perfectly known; they can rather be estimated, and any estimation error could result in divergence from the optimal decision, which subsequently affects the performance of energy efficiency. The traffic loads of the sleeping base stations for the next time slot are required because the switching decisions are made proactively in the current time slot. Two different Q-learning algorithms are developed: one is full-scale, focusing solely on the performance, while the other is lightweight and addresses the computational cost. Results confirm that the estimation error is capable of changing cell switching decisions, yielding performance divergence compared to no-error scenarios. Moreover, the developed Q-learning algorithms perform well since an insignificant difference (i.e., 0.3%) is observed between them and the optimum algorithm.