Geographies of commitment and voluntariness: Socio-spatial and normative structures of religion-based intentional communities


Ince B.

37th AESOP 2025 Anual Congress, İstanbul, Turkey, 7 - 11 July 2025, pp.68-69, (Summary Text)

  • Publication Type: Conference Paper / Summary Text
  • City: İstanbul
  • Country: Turkey
  • Page Numbers: pp.68-69
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

This study explores analytically and critically perspective religion-based intentional communities in contemporary contexts as geographies of voluntary segregation and commitment. These religious communal settings intentionally formed by individuals seeking to freely and collectively practice their religion. They purposefully create self-segregated closed entities where religious practices and identities can be preserved. Such communities often formed based on the specialized rules of a particular religion, sect, congregation, or religious movement frequently adopting a stance that challenges mainstream societal norms (i.e., secularization, modernization). They offer a distinctive model of rule-based entities where the religious principles governing communal living practices have often defined by sacred prescript.

Through empirical evidence from diverse religious traditions, this research aims to first understand the dynamics of the normative and organizational structures shaped by the prescribed and pre-consensused religious principles, and then analyze their reflections in spatial configurations and land-use characteristics. The research investigates how fundamentalist religious motivations shape the socio-spatial characteristics of these communities through an analysis of empirical data derived from religion-based intentional communities (i.e., Bruderhof communities, religious kibbutzs, sufi settlements) across diverse geographical contexts and teachings. Specifically, it examines the interplay between the normative and organizational frameworks of religious-based intentional communities and the dynamics of spatial organization. Furthermore, the study comparatively analyzes how diverse religious teachings influence spatial production and explores the similarities and differences among these communities. By adopting an interdiciplinary and multiscalar perspective, this study suggests that normative and spatial characteristics are two central forces shaping the dynamics of religious communal living. It aims to expand the limited body of knowledge on contemporary religion-based intentional communities and to integrate this subject into the urban planning agenda.