Evaluation of changes in biologic markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 index in breast cancer with administration of neoadjuvant dose dense doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel chemotherary


Dede D., Gumuskaya B., Guler G., Onat D., Altundag K., Ozisik Y.

Journal of B.U.ON., cilt.18, sa.2, ss.366-371, 2013 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 18 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2013
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of B.U.ON.
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.366-371
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Breast cancer, ER, HER 2, Ki -67, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, PR
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the changes in biologic markers of breast cancer ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 in locally advanced breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: : Data from 63 locally advanced breast cancer patients (stage II or III), whose histological diagnosis was made by core biopsies were retrospectively evaluated The patients were given 4 cyles of 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin every 15 days followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 every 15 days, and they underwent surgery within two weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle. Expressions in the preoperative and postoperative status of ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 were compared. Results: The patient mean age was 49.2 ±10.7 years and most (57.1%) were premenopausal. Clinical stages of patients ranged between T2N1 and T3N2. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 14.9% (N=9). Two (5.7%) patients who were ER positive prior to treatment showed ER negativity after treatment. In 7 (21.1%) patients PR became negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in 3 (9.0%) patients PR became positive. Changes in ER and PR receptors were not statistically significant (ER p=0.500 and PR p=0.549, respectively), whereas in 2 (5.8%) patients hormonal status changed significantly when compared to initial biopsies (p=0.003). In addition, median value for PR intensity decreased from 20 to 10% (p=0.003) and Ki-67 values decreased from 10 to 1% (p<0.001) following neoadjuvant therapy. Six (17%) patients exhibited some changes in HER 2 staining. HER 2 expression became 2+ in 3 patients who were HER 2 negative prior to treatment, and HER 2 expression became negative in two patients with HER 2 1+ and 2+ prior to treatment following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: The biological markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 index demonstrated differences after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients. These changes may affect the treatment decision.