The evaluation of pancreas β-cell autoantibodies in non-diabetic COVID-19 patients


Creative Commons License

Kayhan S., Hepsen S., Kalkisim H. K., Sendur I. N., ALTAY F. A., Yalcindag A.

Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol.66, no.4, pp.459-465, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 66 Issue: 4
  • Publication Date: 2022
  • Doi Number: 10.20945/2359-3997000000498
  • Journal Name: Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Page Numbers: pp.459-465
  • Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, anti-islet autoantibody, anti-GAD autoantibody, anti-insulin autoantibody
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Affiliated: No

Abstract

© 2022, Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia. All rights reserved.Objective: This study aims to evaluate potential pancreas endocrine damage due to SARS-CoV-2 by measuring β-cell autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients. Subjects and methods: Between June and July 2020, 95 inpatients with a positive COVID-19 test result after polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) and who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study. Laboratory parameters that belong to glucose metabolism and β-cell autoantibodies, including anti-islet, anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase, and anti-insulin autoantibodies, were measured. β-cell autoantibodies levels of the patients were measured during COVID-19 diagnosis. Positive results were reevaluated in the 3rd month of control. Results: In the initial evaluation, 4 (4.2%) patients were positive for anti-islet autoantibody. Only one (1.1%) patient was positive for anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody. No patient had positive results for anti-insulin autoantibody. FPG, HbA1c, and C-peptide levels were similar in patients who were split into groups regarding the initial positive or negative status of anti-islet and anti-GAD autoantibodies (p>0.05). In the 3rd month after the initial measurements, anti-islet autoantibody positivity of 2 (50%) of 4 patients and anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase positivity of 1 (100%) patient were persistent. Finally, 3 (3.1%) patients in the whole group were positive for anti-islet autoantibody in the 3rd month of control. No difference was determined between the initial and the 3rd month of parameters of glucose metabolism. Conclusion: Following an ongoing autoantibody positivity in the present study brings the mind that SARS-CoV-2 may be responsible for the diabetogenic effect. Clinicians should be aware of autoantibody-positive DM as a potential autoimmune complication in patients with SARS-CoV-2.