Verification of enzymatic ethanol analysis method and method comparison with headspace gas chromatography Enzimatik etanol analiz yönteminin doǧrulanmasl ve headspace gaz kromatografisi ile yöntem karşllaştlrmasl

Creative Commons License

Ozturk A., Temel I., Yalcindag A., Ucar F., Yay F.

Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, cilt.47, 2022 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus, TRDizin)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 47
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1515/tjb-2021-0280
  • Dergi Adı: Turkish Journal of Biochemistry
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: enzymatic method, ethanol, headspace gas chromatography, method comparison, method verification, enzimatik metot, etanol, headspace gaz kromatografisi, metot karsilastirma, metot verifikasyonu
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

© 2022 This study aimed to verify the enzymatic ethanol analysis method and compare the technique with headspace gas chromatography (HS/GC). The limit of the blank, limit of detection, and limit of quantification, precision, linearity, and accuracy of the enzymatic process were evaluated based on the data obtained. In addition, a method comparison was made between the enzymatic method and the HS/GC analysis method. It was seen that the enzymatic method was linear in the range of 14-450 mg/dL, the coefficient of variation and bias values ranged between 0.5-1.09% and 4.52-9.78%, respectively. The quantitative accuracy was 2.13% and 2.23% at concentrations of 41.16 and 95.82 mg/dL, respectively. When the regression analysis was performed between the results obtained using the enzymatic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and HS/GC methods, y=0.966x + 2.084 linear relationship formula and regression coefficient of r2=0.9987, it was found that it showed a good agreement at a confidence interval of 5%. The findings showed that the enzymatic method had good linearity, excellent precision, and a high correlation with the higher-order comparator method, the HS/GC method, in the ethanol analysis.