Atıf Formatları
GİNGİVAL BİYOTİPİN BELİRLENMESİNDE KULLANILAN İKİ FARKLI ÖLÇÜM TEKNİĞİNİN GÜVENİRLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
  • IEEE
  • ACM
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • BibTeX

Y. Kaya, " COMPARISON THE RELIABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE THE GINGIVAL BIOTYPE," Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , vol.22, no.1, pp.42-47, 2015

Kaya, Y. 2015. COMPARISON THE RELIABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE THE GINGIVAL BIOTYPE. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , vol.22, no.1 , 42-47.

Kaya, Y., (2015). COMPARISON THE RELIABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE THE GINGIVAL BIOTYPE. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , vol.22, no.1, 42-47.

Kaya, YEŞİM. " COMPARISON THE RELIABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE THE GINGIVAL BIOTYPE," Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , vol.22, no.1, 42-47, 2015

Kaya, YEŞİM. " COMPARISON THE RELIABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE THE GINGIVAL BIOTYPE." Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , vol.22, no.1, pp.42-47, 2015

Kaya, Y. (2015) . " COMPARISON THE RELIABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE THE GINGIVAL BIOTYPE." Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , vol.22, no.1, pp.42-47.

@article{article, author={YEŞİM KAYA}, title={ COMPARISON THE RELIABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USED TO DETERMINE THE GINGIVAL BIOTYPE}, journal={Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi}, year=2015, pages={42-47} }